138 - The definition of a definition is exclusionary

#unapologetic

What is a woman?  Is it down to femininity?  No.  Her uterus?  No.  Her breasts?  No.  Her hips?  No.  Her legs?  No.  Her butt?  No.  Her sexuality?  No.  Winning the approval of illusive jerks?  No.  The amount of abuse they endure?  No.  Her emotional priorities?  No.  Do you know who has the right to define a woman?  Babies.  Why?  Does the definition of innocence (i.e. babies) define its mother without consent or experiences outside the womb (by latching)?  Yes.  You know why?   Strong men side with their child’s definition of a woman.  Babies are gullible, so fathers are present to protect (for better or worse) that dynamic from “influence.”  How’s that?  My son refuses to hug me; he flees to his mother like a fly to horse shit.  That’s exclusionary.  It’s unfair but that's reality.  Influence tries to manipulate that desire to be a mother and make it more accessible to people who cannot define a woman.  The irony is…to be expected. 
 
Whatever the definition of a woman truly is, BELIEVE ME, it’s fucking exclusionary.  Not everyone can be a woman.  Fact.  Based on the opinion of a strong, straight male, the birth of a baby makes "girlz" into women (and mothers).  You can't be a girl forever.  Girlz can get pregnant, but does that make them mothers if their (potential) offspring doesn't (successfully) define their womanhood more attractively than single life?  There's no ignition defining a woman (and a mother) until a strong man makes girlz decide with the shock of conception.  Does the father stick around?  No?  Then you got pregnant by a boy.  Boyz mature too slowly for women.  Girlz develop too fast for men.  That’s why you have teen pregnancy…young mothers are defined before liberty could introduce them to the longevity of their choices.  Motherhood is a life long commitment.  This article has the perspective from a redeemable man who believes girlz cannot be happy without options.  Options to escape responsibility (like girls night).  Why?  Vaginas give girlz privileges, like the “platonic” devotion of weak men.  A baby will rip a pussy apart.  Stretch-marks.  Saggy tits.  No thanks.  Girlz want to live their best life forever.
 
In a straight, white male’s eyes, babies define a woman.  A baby latches to the biological female with the father making sure that bond is secured.  Unless there’s no daddy present (or mother).  Yet womanhood remains this alluring battle for autonomy (from men).  That's why abortion is so cherished, because it turns out (for half the population) babies don't define their womanhood (more attractively than single life).  Regardless, babies instinctually define their mother without consent or experience outside the womb a life long commitment.  Presumptuous?  Maybe some women don’t care, they want to live their life like the party doesn’t stop.  My body my choice means liberty from men who take their choice away.  Right?  You would think…  Women define themselves by the liberty of (government’s) influence to demonize men who hurt women with their unapologetic accusations.  Such as this article.
 
I was party to an abortion, so I’m not a hypocrite.  My life would have completely changed.  I wasn't ready and it was with the wrong person.  I killed my baby.  I was a twenty-something boy.  She was a twenty-something girl.  A man isn't defined by babies, a man is defined by Jesus; an elusive jerk that friend-zones the planet.  Fuckin asshole.  Do friends define a man?  Attention defines addictions.  Stoicism is a virtue.  Men are stoic when Jesus instructs them so.  Girlz are mothers when their child successfully defines (for them) their womanhood trumps singlehood.  When you were pregnant, were you a "girl" or a woman?  A biological woman ultimately decides what defines herself (morally or not).  “Platonically-devoted,” weak men…validate womanhood (morally or not) in the hopes they can get laid. 
 
Girlz crave the elusive jerk to be dominant because passive men are too easy to validate with their beauty.  Girlz want to validate elusive jerks.  Jerks aren’t built to give girlz want they want (to settle for marriage) because there’s no incentive to relinquish the liberty men have to avoid responsibility of impregnating a crazy bitch.  Crazy bitches know how to fuck.  It’s the perfect cocktail for a perverted morale.  With vagina comes privileges, with liberty comes freedom.  Men don’t have the allure of vaginas to UP their game.  Man wants liberty to enslave women’s goal to validate elusive jerks, before women give up and settle for “platonically-devoted” weak men when choices run out.  The power of sex to a woman is control.  Women are the biggest control freaks.  Pussy entitles them beyond reason.  That’s the incentive elusive jerks justify to ghost girlz they’ve had sex with.  Who wants to deal with that?  Go bitch to a weak man about how I hurt you.  Come back when you want some good dick.
 
Elusive-jerks control women with attention.  Women worship being controlled by men they don’t deserve.  Hypergamy.  They live for the small bursts of fantasy, not the long drudges of reality.  Vagina is a portal to fantasy via climax (for all involved).  Men are pigs because girlz are easily manipulated.  Women are pigs thanks to the incredible choice of sexual partners.  “Platonically-devoted” weak men satisfy their emotional priorities.  Weak men never get a crack at the pussy.  Women are brilliant when it comes to juggling relationships: Balancing emotional affairs with physical ones.  Women love giving away free samples.  Only the chosen will get their dick wet.   Boy is there plenty of choices to fuck THAT up.  I don’t have the right to define women, but who’s going to stop a straight, white, male?
 
“Good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.  Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times.” This is a modified quote, from a post apocalyptic novel by the author G. Michael Hopf
 
Am I a strong man or weak man

Who is your favorite singer?

x x