ATTENTION: This article has been promoted to our resource section. The resource section will be updated.
ATTENTION: This article has been promoted to our resource section. The resource section will be updated.
To define denial, you must accept the power of humility. God doesn’t make accidents appear planned, so God’s will trumps autonomy; we deny our gut’s talent to filter behaviours that accept “error.” Why? Narcissism. To define denial, you must accept the power of humility is lost on those who politicize behaviour; attempting to circumvent God’s will. Error is designed to humble. Denial’s agenda is to grow opposing views. Why? Unlike denial, humility is not a stubborn sensation; it’s comfortable being ignored. Why? A humble person doesn’t require celebrity. Besides, accepting error hasn’t the incentive denial does. What’s the incentive to be humble? A clear conscience. What’s the incentive of denial? To circumvent God’s will to humble Satan’s narcissism: selfishness, involving a sense of entitlement, a lack of empathy, and a need for admiration, as characterizing a personality type. Thanks to psychosis, in my research the worst-case scenario for humanity is normalizing incestuous-pedophilia, so I accept this reality to avoid the crippling anxiety, stress, and illness this revelation predictably serves. Predictability serves incestuous-pedophile's boldness via grooming (i.e., LBGQT+). Publicly admitting this belief, there are risks being the recipient of judgement, violence, and imprisonment. Denial’s agenda is to grow opposing views (to escape the reality we INSTANTLY deny) until the population is divided equally between delusion and conspiracy.
Instant denial suggests this revelation will ostracize and crucify. Both ends fear the consequences of being associated with the worst-case scenario (they suffer in silence), so to deflect their burgeoning guilt they ACCUSE brave outliers (exercising error) for accusers to remain safe within the cowardly masses established by denial’s division. Those who are ostracized are humbled by the backlash. Error is designed to humble those who accept and deny reality. When the majority denies reality, the advantage of numbers does little to convince those with a dirty conscience to regret their actions. Hence the addiction to relief. Hence the addiction to huddle within large camps of opinions. The power of humility brings clarity to revelations which can be exposed intelligently. The power of humility is to clean your conscience, and a clean conscience is worth the outrage. Isn’t that interesting? Narcissists are not humble because they instantly deny revelations that will ostracize or crucify. To define denial, you must accept the power of humility is lost on those who politicize behaviour attempting to circumvent God’s will. Error is designed to humble.
Delusion and conspiracy were invented by denial to grow opposing views. Why two camps? Why not just everyone accept we are incestuous-pedophiles? Defensive posturing is defined by two things: thoughts are illegal and thoughts are not illegal. I fall into the camp where thoughts are not illegal. I’m in the minority, obviously. As an outlier, I have the clarity to expose the hypocrisy of deniers accusing others exclusively to deflect from their own guilt. Our worth is tied to redemption. Without a concrete way to redeem yourself, few turn to faith in God. Faith is also divided by delusion and conspiracy. Jesus is the REEEEEEE’deemer. What’s an easier way to project redemption? Deny or accept the worst-case scenario makes instant cowards, because thoughts are believed to be illegal. It’s a belief, atheists... But cowards group-think with the majority. Jesus was the outlier and was sentenced to hell. I bet Jesus regretted saving humanity. Why? Cleaning your conscience is hellish. Jesus accepted the conscience of the majority to be redeemed by God for restoring humanity’s worth by dying for our sins.
Did Jesus save us in vain of our predictable nature to sin? That’s why earth is not heaven. You have to earn salvation by accepting Jesus’ sacrifice. Denying yourself salvation (strangers gift you), over the fear you will be crucified for your faith. Pathetic. Damnation is the majority’s afterlife. LBGTQ+ are amongst the incestuous-pedophiles that are uniquely emboldened to normalize the sexualization of children. Ask me how I know? Mother-fucking-psychosis! To accept this debauchery is our nature. But what comes naturally to us only makes it more difficult to avoid natural pleasures. Sin is natural. IF incestuous-pedophilia is perceived as a sin, that depends on the cowards of public opinions that ignorantly sympathize with incestuous-pedophiles (unbeknownst to them the irony) . The fall of Rome ended with legalizing incestuous-pedophilia. That’s my claim. My conscience is clean because Jesus died for our sins. Only us few believers in Christ are beacons of hope for heathens. I know I can’t change your minds, but I’m going to die trying. Why? We need to respect traditional family values, or the nations you enjoy now will “reset” with communism.
David and Goliath. Here’s a spin on a classic myth.
I am staring at myself in the mirror. Then I start punching myself in the face because I don’t like what I see. I’m getting uglier and uglier, which means I punch harder and harder. I’ve become the monster my insecurity suggested. That’s torture. I start looking for “Davids” in my life to attack to feel better about myself. David…is the mirror. David is the Goliath of Goliaths. You reap what you sow. Words represent violence to the sentimental. The past is gone. Get over it. Enough is enough. Stop punching yourself Goliath. Heartbreak is inevitable. God designed Dorcas without your approval. Write a few books about it. Publish them. Then move on knowing art is just a mirror: you are offended by you, or the absence of you. Such is life.
This song is dedicated to every woman (I pursued) who never loved me back. ‘I Love to Love’ by La Bouche
Heartbreak is inevitable. Stop acting like you have time to suffer. You don’t. You don’t have time to suffer. Dorcas sharpened me. Satan is the biggest Goliath.
Proverbs 27:17, As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.
Narrated by James McCreadie
Do you consider it unfortunate…when the opposition succeeds in corrupting your confidence? If a balance of expression consists of assuredness and doubt as logical. It’s illogical to consider it unfortunate to lose your confidence in your fantasy—I mean faith—I mean...*sigh* Why? It’s inevitable; experiencing discomfort should not be resented because it’s well known to be inevitable. Doubt informs us that our mortality and ego are in danger of disappearing, and that’s important because the afterlife has neither. Your faith is fallible, God or no. You are fallible, and you cannot perceive perfection without risking your sanity or your life. I wager I have perceived the closest thing to perfection humanity knows, shy of Jesus. My psychosis IQ was 667. Why do I know this? I was smarter than the devil. His IQ? 666. Jesus doesn’t have an IQ because IQ suggests you know less than God. Jesus is as good as God. Why? Hmm, can perfection be imperfect? Aren’t flaws endearing when they make others happy? Jesus is as good as God. But how can I perceive perfection while I’m fallible? I must accept the putrid faults perfection exposed me to. All of them. I’m AWARE of my putrid, satanic faults and instead of being in denial, I self-published all of them in books crawling towards my reintroduction to perfection; hopefully before I die, to educate my children. Psychosis helped me believe I understood the universe; that was an EXTREMELY delusional experience. But it doesn’t mean that altitude (of being) doesn’t impart perspective unto the BIGGEST of fools. Example? I voted for Justin Trudeau in 2015 because a Canadian actor named Mike Myers of 1999’s Austin Powers: The Spy who Shagged Me fame, dressed as a Mountie, endorsed Trudeau on the American broadcast The Colbert Report. That’s how big of a fucking Lib-tard I was. Now I write this with the clarity of a forgiven man of God.
All I know is this: it’s logical to conclude an ULTIMATE God can elude us on a need-to-know basis. Ci? I mean come on… We can’t find proof because we’re too dumb. Simple. Even for me at the peak of my insanity, it didn’t even register what’s necessary to understand perfection because I was lost in my attempts to document the experience. You can only accept you’ll never know perfection without God. You and I are too dumb because we wince at what we well know is unfortunate…when the opposition succeeds in corrupting our confidence regarding the effectiveness of faith *cough* atheism. Aren’t we in pursuit of truth, or is that an assumption of mine? It’s inevitable. Faith is logical because humans invest in fantasies to SURVIVE their own denial. If you don’t invest in their fantasies, you will have no hope of controlling their denial. You want to control your opposition, yes? *shrugs* Invest in fantasies that control your opposition’s denial like the expectation: achieving the impossible is possible. Atheists are endeared to whatever goes out of its way to be disproven by logic; convincing atheists that they too…are gods in sheep’s clothing, smiting fallacy in disguise (i.e., heroes, villains). Atheists are vindicated by a god who disappoints like clockwork. However, fantasy is the reality of denial. Denial is the freedom to judge others until a consensus concludes EVERYONE accepts in unison. That never happens. Even if that were the case, to accept is not necessarily moral, correct, or possible. For example, is it moral to kill unborn babies? YUP. Is it correct to award women the legal right to kill unborn babies? Hell, yes. Is it possible to accept conception begins with irresponsible choices? DATS WAYCIST!!! See? I invest in my opposition’s fantasies, which are the realities of their denial. I support their body, my choice because I want their support (in return) to champion the prohibition of vaccine mandates. My body, their choice. You need a balance of God, science, and magic to maintain soulistic equilibrium. This will balance you, but know God doesn’t like “lukewarm” faith. Does that disappoint you? Vindicated. You resent pain.
It’s a terrible thing to be perfect. Why? Who wants to confirm we deserve to die for the crime of being ourselves? Like an ANT on your kitchen floor. We all have this fear, and it’s warranted given thoughts are illegal (thanks to hypocrites in denial). I’ve spelled it out for you. This is my charity. I pay YOU…to expand YOUR mind and exercise YOUR conscience. Once your conscience starts to deny you comfort, you will conclude theft is occurring, and charging me is not appropriate. I am a charity that knows its value demands the highest respect. Why respect me? If you must ask…it's logical to conclude that an ultimate God knows how to elude us on a need-to-know basis. You don’t need to know; you want to know before you risk having your heart betrayed like clockwork. I can trust my senses because I’m not a “prisoner of reputation” to be cancelled by insecure feminazis. Your livelihood rests on idiots using free apps like Google and Yelp to help government use citizens’ privacy to be exchanged for free services; to discover how best to squeeze dry (illegally) as much profit as possible out of the population. It's transfer of wealth. War is just a “transaction” to a bank. War is just a request for a withdrawal. Defeat covers the cost.
People live (with ultimate power) to destroy our lives in exchange for a feeling of purpose (eluding their denial). Government is a money laundering operation using up precious resources to entertain the denial from within (that will never be accepted by voters) with…a vain outlook on fate. Are you entertained by the influence of denial? Elated even? If peace requires blissful ignorance, that is reflected in the conscience of elected government not to waste time on fruitless endeavours. Fruitless for who? Us or them? If you’re smart enough, you’ll agree with me. You don’t need to be a god to figure that out. How do I know? If the value of my charity isn’t worth your free and undivided attention, I’ll not waste my time. I will happily pay you to cut my losses. It’s my education plan (for you). I pay PhDs to read my work. I know my worth, and I’m transparent about my flaws. I published books openly analyzing my journey, tearing away at myself until I achieved soulistic equilibrium. In my writing, I have the equivalent of a Doctorate of Philosophy, to put it in your terms. Is that a cringeworthy claim? Well, luckily for me it only cost the price of books to know what I know, so at least I’m not in debt. In November of 2014, psychosis completely raped me of my ignorance, and boy did I learn God is bigger (and smarter) than humanity.
Can you fool an ANT (on your kitchen floor) you won’t step on it? What’s a more powerful vision than to enjoy squishing your unborn baby-I-I-I mean an ant flat. God can do that to you. Why? *shrugs* Earth is not Heaven, heathen. You pretend to be God by killing the trajectory of babies. I’m really taken aback by your illogical “safe space.” Consider yourself this: God is plausible because he can elude dummies like you and me on a need-to-know basis. The proof is in the vindication you relish. You relish superiority. You relish fantasy. You relish denial. Just like Christians. Celebrity is the church of false authority. You judge God through his creation, like you judge artwork from an artist. Aren’t flaws endearing when they vindicate you? I’ll rephrase that: isn’t God’s creation endearing when it vindicates you?
a word or phrase expressing love or affection.
Faith is flawed because it INVESTS in fantasy. What happens when a fantasy vindicates you? Derive a belief there is no reality; there is only the joy of mocking other people’s fantasy. That is the mechanism atheists endear. There is no reality, only fantasy to mock (i.e., Christianity). What incentive is there to branch out from underneath THAT honeypot of delusion, conspiracy, and denial? That’s why I’m here. God is BEYOND the Christian view you endear. You cannot lean on something that doesn’t exist, stupid. You can’t lean on the reality of denial because you are swept up in fantasy (where a good god disappoints like clockwork) mocking those who reject what you reject. The irony hurts atheism’s providence within the scope of true reality. I am beyond the atheistic view I observe objectively. But that doesn’t stop us from endearing the realities of denial. God designed it that way. Why? The past is GONE!!! That amplifies the delicacy…of our mortality and ego that they are in danger of disappearing. That’s important because the afterlife has NEITHER! Get it? There’s no advantage to entering Heaven by investing in finite consequences. Have mercy on yourself. Stop your hunt for confidence in an exclusive direction.
Would you opt to fool yourself out of desperation to forget you’re wrong? Maybe that’s why people suffer and die? Maybe God fools himself into thinking he doesn’t care about you. He proves himself wrong every time, yet it’s not a mistake to script “universal calamity” when it’s intentioned to keep God entertained from his duties: to run the fucking universe, asshole! No one in their right mind can understand that. Remove yourself from the notion God’s love guarantees you a good life with a vain outlook. Earth is not Heaven, heathen. That’s why you relish the lack of perfection. Vanity. Why would God fool himself? We are born in God’s image to forget the guilt of sparking to life with (or without) consent merely to bring purpose to our lives; unwilling to accept your denial of remorse. By design, fooling oneself never works (by design). Think about that insanity! I’m not here to “convert.” I’m here to EXPAND! Logic implies balanced responses to (awkward) danger; therefore, you need a balance that comprises God, science, and magic. None of these other gods enjoy lukewarm faith either…because they too can’t control perfection without FANTASY (hence the success of indoctrinating children too young to think critically). These kids grow up, and they compensate their denial by mocking other people’s fantasies (through politics). Which is why God fractured our ascension with the inclusion of science and magic. You are hunting fire to know Jesus, just like me. There’s more fire where I am, come…humour me if you wish to learn. I don’t charge, and I don’t pay. Donations accepted.
Narrated by James McCreadie
Shame is the marriage between guilt and ego. Guilt is why we thrive in denial. Ego is why we never accept we can forgive ourselves. Our conscience is comprised of a scale (see above) with two opposites: Delusion and Conspiracy. I believe politics is an exercise in conscience, which explains why denial is the policy of liars. Public figures coax our conscience into accepting denial’s participation is necessary, in the process of deciding what is moral. Do you accept that? The problem with conscience is that it’s a double-edged sword. The default response to an accusation is the reaction (to denial) is with denial; in the direction of delusion or conspiracy (see above). Like skipping a flat stone across still water, our position skips left or right as acceptance grows more agreeable; skipping back and forth as one's conscience is agitated. To me delusion is represented by the extreme political left, and the extreme political right is represented by conspiracy. Each have insight into each other which makes the response to their accusations predictable. The accuracy of these "prophecies" inevitability strokes our egos with the admirable critique of celebrity. The delusional become conspiracists, and the conspiracists become delusional. Accusers fixate on what they can identify as unjust, ironically they are guilty of injustice (by their own definition). The accusers are the victims of hypocrisy.
Predictability is considered a weakness because illusiveness evades the pinpointing of denial (to be exploited), much like a boxer slipping an opponent’s jab. The opposite of ego is humility. When we are humble, we accept immediately our position in the spectrum of our conscience. The politically centered. In all honesty, "group think" has more to do with defensive posturing than offensive. Why? People in denial will gladly skip up or down the spectrum of conscience (through the mine field of denial) until they reach the absolute LIMIT of opinion. Ironically, their ego incentivizes the individual with not settle for less, and this temptation rewards embracing extreme views with camaraderie (i.e., vaxxers and anti-vaxxers). This is why the conscience is largely a bipolar affair. Humbled outliers hug the center of the spectrum because as an action dribbles instances of reality (into their conscience), the humbled have the capability to immediately accept what is moral without prejudice. Their position is made clear through their acute intelligence and courage to publicly concede or offend appropriately. People in denial live with the weight of their lies, sizzling on the hot skillet (of denial). Popping-sparks-of-oily-spit-stinging-their-heels with the reaction to deny (with denial); acceptance is their safe haven from the ironic pain. Pain doesn't humble itself fast enough, so time remedies that with the torture of involuntary boredom, especially through addiction and sloth.
Guilt is exercising the inability to react to conscience with humility; ego enables guilt to grow freely as a point of misplaced pride. Why? Vanity. Never give in to the enemy. Who’s your enemy? Ego deems you as the enemy. Can you forgive yourself? No? Why? You may need others (with the courage) to forgive (via proxy) because I speak from experience; I haven’t the courage to know how or when to concede or offend others appropriately (like a comedian). Why? The consequence of honesty makes you a target for ridicule when your attempts to concede or offend are mistimed. This is so because EVERYONE recognizes this opportunity to EXPLOIT others because it doesn’t require courage to critique with vanity, especially if it deflects from their own guilt to accept they can't forgive themselves without help. Jesus doesn't exploit. Exploitation is a cathartic ruse that in a cowardly way exercises a liar’s conscience to make ends meet briefly. Hence the addiction to relief. Celebrity gossip is the prime example. To remain topical, one shares their "take" on morality to exercise their conscience as a take.
This “take” (by default) divides with the acceptance of our triumphs and flaws, or...deny yourself the opportunity (thanks to your pride). Acceptance could represent blind devotion. Denial, could represent disassociating publicly (and exclusively) to disguise one’s own guilt. What cowards! Only the humble can forgive themselves. God humbles us with his infinite capacity to forgive. Our faith in God is finite because our consciousness is limited. Insanity (i.e., psychosis) is expressed to hyper-expand our consciousness beyond the denial we LONG to avoid our doubt in Christ. That relationship between acceptance and denial breeds guilt within those who are slaves to their ego’s misplaced pride. If it’s appropriate to forgive myself, then what do I gain by ignoring that opportunity (like so many)? If humble outliers remain lonely (together), prideful comrades grow in numbers, enabling their reactions to deny with denial (not acceptance). That cycle establishes bonds faster than solitude can. That's a problem, because humble people are being outbred by those who lazily deny their flaw's opportunity to heal with acceptance. That requires insight from a guru. Me.
I am looking for lonely people to be friends. I am a guru for charity.
Fathers are seedless fruit that grow in burning bushes. Daughters must burn their hands to take our fruit, but they can't plant their own bush because there are no seeds to harvest. Daughters resent the fire like they resent an empty belly. Fathers are resented for their talent to decipher the Lord's inspiration. Daughter's of magic hunt fire to know Jesus.
Women that can’t have what they desire, opens the door to depravity. Depravity weakens the morals of the simple minded. Simple minded people are predictably compromised by depravity. When women are depraved by their desires…it dictates how to satisfy itself. Do not listen to it if you want respect. When the “universe” dictates what is satisfactory, bonds are blurred. Blurred bonds satisfies deprived minds.
When you buy a pack of smokes, the branding minces no words about the risk to your health. Smoking causes mouth, lung and throat cancer, harm to unborn babies, blindness, heart disease, etc. Yet people ignore the warnings. I suspect the reason for this is denial and delusion. Denial goes so far as to shift the risks towards the reward of ignorance: borrowed time. That ignorance is a willful delusion because thanks to borrowed time, risks don’t apply. Until they do. The greatest motivation to change occurs when it’s too late; like those who refuse to admit they’re in denial. Denial moderates the tug of war between awareness and delusion. It accomplishes this through denial's resilience to linger. The effects of cigarettes are irreversible. The warning label makes that clear, so why be tempted?
Borrowed time, bets against your health to deliver pleasure. Denial is the subliminal foundation of pleasure, because it rewards the act of willful ignorance. That ignorance sustains itself within delusion briefly. One’s lack of will (to sustain ignorance) is the borrowed time that bets against your health. When that will is gone, it’s time to deliver the subliminal foundation of pleasure. When Justin Trudeau said the F-word in the house of commons recently, liberals were quick to praise his behaviour. One person on Twitter said, “I like him more now.” Can you see the parallel I’m highlighting here? The leader of your party conducts himself poorly, and yet the response from his voters are positive. Changing one’s mind is irreversible when the risks don’t apply to those who refuse to admit they’re in denial.
Denial is only accountable when it’s respected by your self-awareness. Awareness has its own faults, but delusion backtracks from denial through the pleasure of cowardice. It’s tough to quit a poor idea when your delusion convinces you that risks don’t apply to the pursuit of poor choices. When pleasure fades, so too does your willful ignorance to the consequences you ignored (i.e. warning label). It’s a cycle of addiction (in both drugs and politics) that decides not just your fate, but others as well. Explain to me how addiction solves our problems? Last I checked that’s impossible. There’s an imbalance in the mind that siphons the resolve of its neighbouring functions to make ends meet (briefly). Yes, people excel through addiction but it’s only on borrowed time. Your borrowed time, and other people’s borrowed time. The pleasure of cowardice finds a home in numbers. As a group, pleasure celebrates one’s capacity to ignore the consequences with camaraderie.
Pack mentality overcomes the group’s individual consequences. It’s a hypocritical choice because their choices affect not just themselves. My body my choice, or rather my mind my choice. This stubbornness is rooted in denial, and that denial votes for policy. How can a position in health choices or politics be justified when their consequences suffer and kill beyond their control. My mind, your choice. Is really the crux of this matter. If you suffer from denial, you can’t make good choices for yourself or others. You outsource your choices to an authority (i.e. drugs and politicians) that accepts your blame (with pride). You enable each other to reoffend (like an olympic game of leapfrog). The pleasure of cowardice enables the cycle of poor choices to occur when risks don’t apply. There’s no warning label in politics, only the denial that votes in policy where an authority accepts your blame with pride, not regret. Temptation pleasures us with borrowed time.
The first line in the Canadian charter of rights reads, “Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law.” Problem is magic is heresy. That absolute divides Canada by believers and non-believers. Canada defines compassion regardless of difference.
5/11/2022 0 Comments
What is a woman? Is it down to femininity? No. Her uterus? No. Her breasts? No. Her hips? No. Her legs? No. Her butt? No. Her sexuality? No. Winning the approval of illusive jerks? No. The amount of abuse they endure? No. Her emotional priorities? No. Do you know who has the right to define a woman? Babies. Why? Does the definition of innocence (i.e. babies) define its mother without consent or experiences outside the womb (by latching)? Yes. You know why? Strong men side with their child’s definition of a woman. Babies are gullible, so fathers are present to protect (for better or worse) that dynamic from “influence.” How’s that? My son refuses to hug me; he flees to his mother like a fly to horse shit. That’s exclusionary. It’s unfair but that's reality. Influence tries to manipulate that desire to be a mother and make it more accessible to people who cannot define a woman. The irony is…to be expected.
Whatever the definition of a woman truly is, BELIEVE ME, it’s fucking exclusionary. Not everyone can be a woman. Fact. Based on the opinion of a strong, straight male, the birth of a baby makes "girlz" into women (and mothers). You can't be a girl forever. Girlz can get pregnant, but does that make them mothers if their (potential) offspring doesn't (successfully) define their womanhood more attractively than single life? There's no ignition defining a woman (and a mother) until a strong man makes girlz decide with the shock of conception. Does the father stick around? No? Then you got pregnant by a boy. Boyz mature too slowly for women. Girlz develop too fast for men. That’s why you have teen pregnancy…young mothers are defined before liberty could introduce them to the longevity of their choices. Motherhood is a life long commitment. This article has the perspective from a redeemable man who believes girlz cannot be happy without options. Options to escape responsibility (like girls night). Why? Vaginas give girlz privileges, like the “platonic” devotion of weak men. A baby will rip a pussy apart. Stretch-marks. Saggy tits. No thanks. Girlz want to live their best life forever.
In a straight, white male’s eyes, babies define a woman. A baby latches to the biological female with the father making sure that bond is secured. Unless there’s no daddy present (or mother). Yet womanhood remains this alluring battle for autonomy (from men). That's why abortion is so cherished, because it turns out (for half the population) babies don't define their womanhood (more attractively than single life). Regardless, babies instinctually define their mother without consent or experience outside the womb a life long commitment. Presumptuous? Maybe some women don’t care, they want to live their life like the party doesn’t stop. My body my choice means liberty from men who take their choice away. Right? You would think… Women define themselves by the liberty of (government’s) influence to demonize men who hurt women with their unapologetic accusations. Such as this article.
I was party to an abortion, so I’m not a hypocrite. My life would have completely changed. I wasn't ready and it was with the wrong person. I killed my baby. I was a twenty-something boy. She was a twenty-something girl. A man isn't defined by babies, a man is defined by Jesus; an elusive jerk that friend-zones the planet. Fuckin asshole. Do friends define a man? Attention defines addictions. Stoicism is a virtue. Men are stoic when Jesus instructs them so. Girlz are mothers when their child successfully defines (for them) their womanhood trumps singlehood. When you were pregnant, were you a "girl" or a woman? A biological woman ultimately decides what defines herself (morally or not). “Platonically-devoted,” weak men…validate womanhood (morally or not) in the hopes they can get laid.
Girlz crave the elusive jerk to be dominant because passive men are too easy to validate with their beauty. Girlz want to validate elusive jerks. Jerks aren’t built to give girlz want they want (to settle for marriage) because there’s no incentive to relinquish the liberty men have to avoid responsibility of impregnating a crazy bitch. Crazy bitches know how to fuck. It’s the perfect cocktail for a perverted morale. With vagina comes privileges, with liberty comes freedom. Men don’t have the allure of vaginas to UP their game. Man wants liberty to enslave women’s goal to validate elusive jerks, before women give up and settle for “platonically-devoted” weak men when choices run out. The power of sex to a woman is control. Women are the biggest control freaks. Pussy entitles them beyond reason. That’s the incentive elusive jerks justify to ghost girlz they’ve had sex with. Who wants to deal with that? Go bitch to a weak man about how I hurt you. Come back when you want some good dick.
Elusive-jerks control women with attention. Women worship being controlled by men they don’t deserve. Hypergamy. They live for the small bursts of fantasy, not the long drudges of reality. Vagina is a portal to fantasy via climax (for all involved). Men are pigs because girlz are easily manipulated. Women are pigs thanks to the incredible choice of sexual partners. “Platonically-devoted” weak men satisfy their emotional priorities. Weak men never get a crack at the pussy. Women are brilliant when it comes to juggling relationships: Balancing emotional affairs with physical ones. Women love giving away free samples. Only the chosen will get their dick wet. Boy is there plenty of choices to fuck THAT up. I don’t have the right to define women, but who’s going to stop a straight, white, male?
“Good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times.” This is a modified quote, from a post apocalyptic novel by the author G. Michael Hopf
Am I a strong man or weak man
Who is your favorite singer?
It's as simple as that. Jesus can meet you halfway. Conservatives only need to disclose to Jesus when a Liberal is correct.