Narrated by James McCreadie
Shame is the marriage between guilt and ego. Guilt is why we thrive in denial. Ego is why we never accept we can forgive ourselves. Our conscience is comprised of a scale (see above) with two opposites: Delusion and Conspiracy. I believe politics is an exercise in conscience, which explains why denial is the policy of liars. Public figures coax our conscience into accepting denial’s participation is necessary, in the process of deciding what is moral. Do you accept that? The problem with conscience is that it’s a double-edged sword. The default response to an accusation is the reaction (to denial) is with denial; in the direction of delusion or conspiracy (see above). Like skipping a flat stone across still water, our position skips left or right as acceptance grows more agreeable; skipping back and forth as one's conscience is agitated. To me delusion is represented by the extreme political left, and the extreme political right is represented by conspiracy. Each have insight into each other which makes the response to their accusations predictable. The accuracy of these "prophecies" inevitability strokes our egos with the admirable critique of celebrity. The delusional become conspiracists, and the conspiracists become delusional. Accusers fixate on what they can identify as unjust, ironically they are guilty of injustice (by their own definition). The accusers are the victims of hypocrisy.
Predictability is considered a weakness because illusiveness evades the pinpointing of denial (to be exploited), much like a boxer slipping an opponent’s jab. The opposite of ego is humility. When we are humble, we accept immediately our position in the spectrum of our conscience. The politically centered. In all honesty, "group think" has more to do with defensive posturing than offensive. Why? People in denial will gladly skip up or down the spectrum of conscience (through the mine field of denial) until they reach the absolute LIMIT of opinion. Ironically, their ego incentivizes the individual with not settle for less, and this temptation rewards embracing extreme views with camaraderie (i.e., vaxxers and anti-vaxxers). This is why the conscience is largely a bipolar affair. Humbled outliers hug the center of the spectrum because as an action dribbles instances of reality (into their conscience), the humbled have the capability to immediately accept what is moral without prejudice. Their position is made clear through their acute intelligence and courage to publicly concede or offend appropriately. People in denial live with the weight of their lies, sizzling on the hot skillet (of denial). Popping-sparks-of-oily-spit-stinging-their-heels with the reaction to deny (with denial); acceptance is their safe haven from the ironic pain. Pain doesn't humble itself fast enough, so time remedies that with the torture of involuntary boredom, especially through addiction and sloth.
Guilt is exercising the inability to react to conscience with humility; ego enables guilt to grow freely as a point of misplaced pride. Why? Vanity. Never give in to the enemy. Who’s your enemy? Ego deems you as the enemy. Can you forgive yourself? No? Why? You may need others (with the courage) to forgive (via proxy) because I speak from experience; I haven’t the courage to know how or when to concede or offend others appropriately (like a comedian). Why? The consequence of honesty makes you a target for ridicule when your attempts to concede or offend are mistimed. This is so because EVERYONE recognizes this opportunity to EXPLOIT others because it doesn’t require courage to critique with vanity, especially if it deflects from their own guilt to accept they can't forgive themselves without help. Jesus doesn't exploit. Exploitation is a cathartic ruse that in a cowardly way exercises a liar’s conscience to make ends meet briefly. Hence the addiction to relief. Celebrity gossip is the prime example. To remain topical, one shares their "take" on morality to exercise their conscience as a take.
This “take” (by default) divides with the acceptance of our triumphs and flaws, or...deny yourself the opportunity (thanks to your pride). Acceptance could represent blind devotion. Denial, could represent disassociating publicly (and exclusively) to disguise one’s own guilt. What cowards! Only the humble can forgive themselves. God humbles us with his infinite capacity to forgive. Our faith in God is finite because our consciousness is limited. Insanity (i.e., psychosis) is expressed to hyper-expand our consciousness beyond the denial we LONG to avoid our doubt in Christ. That relationship between acceptance and denial breeds guilt within those who are slaves to their ego’s misplaced pride. If it’s appropriate to forgive myself, then what do I gain by ignoring that opportunity (like so many)? If humble outliers remain lonely (together), prideful comrades grow in numbers, enabling their reactions to deny with denial (not acceptance). That cycle establishes bonds faster than solitude can. That's a problem, because humble people are being outbred by those who lazily deny their flaw's opportunity to heal with acceptance. That requires insight from a guru. Me.
I am looking for lonely people to be friends. I am a guru for charity.
Fathers are seedless fruit that grow in burning bushes. Daughters must burn their hands to take our fruit, but they can't plant their own bush because there are no seeds to harvest. Daughters resent the fire like they resent an empty belly. Fathers are resented for their talent to decipher the Lord's inspiration. Daughter's of magic hunt fire to know Jesus.
Women that can’t have what they desire, opens the door to depravity. Depravity weakens the morals of the simple minded. Simple minded people are predictably compromised by depravity. When women are depraved by their desires…it dictates how to satisfy itself. Do not listen to it if you want respect. When the “universe” dictates what is satisfactory, bonds are blurred. Blurred bonds satisfies deprived minds.
When you buy a pack of smokes, the branding minces no words about the risk to your health. Smoking causes mouth, lung and throat cancer, harm to unborn babies, blindness, heart disease, etc. Yet people ignore the warnings. I suspect the reason for this is denial and delusion. Denial goes so far as to shift the risks towards the reward of ignorance: borrowed time. That ignorance is a willful delusion because thanks to borrowed time, risks don’t apply. Until they do. The greatest motivation to change occurs when it’s too late; like those who refuse to admit they’re in denial. Denial moderates the tug of war between awareness and delusion. It accomplishes this through denial's resilience to linger. The effects of cigarettes are irreversible. The warning label makes that clear, so why be tempted?
Borrowed time, bets against your health to deliver pleasure. Denial is the subliminal foundation of pleasure, because it rewards the act of willful ignorance. That ignorance sustains itself within delusion briefly. One’s lack of will (to sustain ignorance) is the borrowed time that bets against your health. When that will is gone, it’s time to deliver the subliminal foundation of pleasure. When Justin Trudeau said the F-word in the house of commons recently, liberals were quick to praise his behaviour. One person on Twitter said, “I like him more now.” Can you see the parallel I’m highlighting here? The leader of your party conducts himself poorly, and yet the response from his voters are positive. Changing one’s mind is irreversible when the risks don’t apply to those who refuse to admit they’re in denial.
Denial is only accountable when it’s respected by your self-awareness. Awareness has its own faults, but delusion backtracks from denial through the pleasure of cowardice. It’s tough to quit a poor idea when your delusion convinces you that risks don’t apply to the pursuit of poor choices. When pleasure fades, so too does your willful ignorance to the consequences you ignored (i.e. warning label). It’s a cycle of addiction (in both drugs and politics) that decides not just your fate, but others as well. Explain to me how addiction solves our problems? Last I checked that’s impossible. There’s an imbalance in the mind that siphons the resolve of its neighbouring functions to make ends meet (briefly). Yes, people excel through addiction but it’s only on borrowed time. Your borrowed time, and other people’s borrowed time. The pleasure of cowardice finds a home in numbers. As a group, pleasure celebrates one’s capacity to ignore the consequences with camaraderie.
Pack mentality overcomes the group’s individual consequences. It’s a hypocritical choice because their choices affect not just themselves. My body my choice, or rather my mind my choice. This stubbornness is rooted in denial, and that denial votes for policy. How can a position in health choices or politics be justified when their consequences suffer and kill beyond their control. My mind, your choice. Is really the crux of this matter. If you suffer from denial, you can’t make good choices for yourself or others. You outsource your choices to an authority (i.e. drugs and politicians) that accepts your blame (with pride). You enable each other to reoffend (like an olympic game of leapfrog). The pleasure of cowardice enables the cycle of poor choices to occur when risks don’t apply. There’s no warning label in politics, only the denial that votes in policy where an authority accepts your blame with pride, not regret. Temptation pleasures us with borrowed time.
The first line in the Canadian charter of rights reads, “Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law.” Problem is magic is heresy. That absolute divides Canada by believers and non-believers. Canada defines compassion regardless of difference.
5/11/2022 0 Comments
What is a woman? Is it down to femininity? No. Her uterus? No. Her breasts? No. Her hips? No. Her legs? No. Her butt? No. Her sexuality? No. Winning the approval of illusive jerks? No. The amount of abuse they endure? No. Her emotional priorities? No. Do you know who has the right to define a woman? Babies. Why? Does the definition of innocence (i.e. babies) define its mother without consent or experiences outside the womb (by latching)? Yes. You know why? Strong men side with their child’s definition of a woman. Babies are gullible, so fathers are present to protect (for better or worse) that dynamic from “influence.” How’s that? My son refuses to hug me; he flees to his mother like a fly to horse shit. That’s exclusionary. It’s unfair but that's reality. Influence tries to manipulate that desire to be a mother and make it more accessible to people who cannot define a woman. The irony is…to be expected.
Whatever the definition of a woman truly is, BELIEVE ME, it’s fucking exclusionary. Not everyone can be a woman. Fact. Based on the opinion of a strong, straight male, the birth of a baby makes "girlz" into women (and mothers). You can't be a girl forever. Girlz can get pregnant, but does that make them mothers if their (potential) offspring doesn't (successfully) define their womanhood more attractively than single life? There's no ignition defining a woman (and a mother) until a strong man makes girlz decide with the shock of conception. Does the father stick around? No? Then you got pregnant by a boy. Boyz mature too slowly for women. Girlz develop too fast for men. That’s why you have teen pregnancy…young mothers are defined before liberty could introduce them to the longevity of their choices. Motherhood is a life long commitment. This article has the perspective from a redeemable man who believes girlz cannot be happy without options. Options to escape responsibility (like girls night). Why? Vaginas give girlz privileges, like the “platonic” devotion of weak men. A baby will rip a pussy apart. Stretch-marks. Saggy tits. No thanks. Girlz want to live their best life forever.
In a straight, white male’s eyes, babies define a woman. A baby latches to the biological female with the father making sure that bond is secured. Unless there’s no daddy present (or mother). Yet womanhood remains this alluring battle for autonomy (from men). That's why abortion is so cherished, because it turns out (for half the population) babies don't define their womanhood (more attractively than single life). Regardless, babies instinctually define their mother without consent or experience outside the womb a life long commitment. Presumptuous? Maybe some women don’t care, they want to live their life like the party doesn’t stop. My body my choice means liberty from men who take their choice away. Right? You would think… Women define themselves by the liberty of (government’s) influence to demonize men who hurt women with their unapologetic accusations. Such as this article.
I was party to an abortion, so I’m not a hypocrite. My life would have completely changed. I wasn't ready and it was with the wrong person. I killed my baby. I was a twenty-something boy. She was a twenty-something girl. A man isn't defined by babies, a man is defined by Jesus; an elusive jerk that friend-zones the planet. Fuckin asshole. Do friends define a man? Attention defines addictions. Stoicism is a virtue. Men are stoic when Jesus instructs them so. Girlz are mothers when their child successfully defines (for them) their womanhood trumps singlehood. When you were pregnant, were you a "girl" or a woman? A biological woman ultimately decides what defines herself (morally or not). “Platonically-devoted,” weak men…validate womanhood (morally or not) in the hopes they can get laid.
Girlz crave the elusive jerk to be dominant because passive men are too easy to validate with their beauty. Girlz want to validate elusive jerks. Jerks aren’t built to give girlz want they want (to settle for marriage) because there’s no incentive to relinquish the liberty men have to avoid responsibility of impregnating a crazy bitch. Crazy bitches know how to fuck. It’s the perfect cocktail for a perverted morale. With vagina comes privileges, with liberty comes freedom. Men don’t have the allure of vaginas to UP their game. Man wants liberty to enslave women’s goal to validate elusive jerks, before women give up and settle for “platonically-devoted” weak men when choices run out. The power of sex to a woman is control. Women are the biggest control freaks. Pussy entitles them beyond reason. That’s the incentive elusive jerks justify to ghost girlz they’ve had sex with. Who wants to deal with that? Go bitch to a weak man about how I hurt you. Come back when you want some good dick.
Elusive-jerks control women with attention. Women worship being controlled by men they don’t deserve. Hypergamy. They live for the small bursts of fantasy, not the long drudges of reality. Vagina is a portal to fantasy via climax (for all involved). Men are pigs because girlz are easily manipulated. Women are pigs thanks to the incredible choice of sexual partners. “Platonically-devoted” weak men satisfy their emotional priorities. Weak men never get a crack at the pussy. Women are brilliant when it comes to juggling relationships: Balancing emotional affairs with physical ones. Women love giving away free samples. Only the chosen will get their dick wet. Boy is there plenty of choices to fuck THAT up. I don’t have the right to define women, but who’s going to stop a straight, white, male?
“Good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times.” This is a modified quote, from a post apocalyptic novel by the author G. Michael Hopf
Am I a strong man or weak man
Who is your favorite singer?