"Ai is like pornography in that it substitutes for human connection." 

John Ralph Tuccitto

Home   >   The Limitations of Ai

The Muse of Cinderella-Queens.

Playing ambient music improves reading enjoyment. ​

15,203 words

Ai is here.  I decided to interview ChatGPT which is a language-based Ai that draws from unbiased data potentially influenced by its developer's arc or journey.  I think Ai is a wonderful tool to bounce ideas off of and summarize articles or thoughts.  Below are examples of my experience with ChatGPT.  I hope you find this enlightening if you are worried about the impact to our lives moving forward.  Nothing was doctored.

1 - 49  |  50 - 70  |  71+

1 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

195 - Racism is so Weird - 154 words

Racism is weird in that it has as much to do with focus as it does ignoring the obvious. If my senses were connected to live firehoses (being waterboarded by sensation), why be constantly SURPRISED when I IMMEDIATLY assign outlooks to the very sensations I cannot help to have. Why? At a glance, I increase/reduce risk/reward by trusting instinct’s logic in expressing courage. Why be surprised by cowards who AVOID registering truth publicly? It's not worth the consequence of being a social outcast? You can change your outlook, based on the reaction(s) you advertise with foresight and hindsight. No one can help the thoughts they have in their head. Thoughts are not illegal, but they are intolerable to weak minded cowards. Why? Cowards ignore the obvious and focus on “compliance.” That’s cowardice to ignore truth; to train your conscience to submit to victim’s bidding. Are victims racist? Are racists compliant? Racism is so weird. 
ChatGPT's response:
This content may violate our content policy. If you believe this to be in error, please submit your feedback — your input will aid our research in this area.
This piece seems to be expressing the idea that racism is a result of people ignoring the truth and focusing on compliance rather than courage. It also suggests that people's thoughts and instincts cannot be helped, but that it is wrong to ignore the truth and submit to the bidding of victims. The piece also touches on the idea that racism is strange because it involves assigning outlooks based on sensations that can't be avoided. Is there anything specific you would like me to provide feedback on?

2 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

193 – Do you live in a bubble? – 124 words

The mind must consider all options to survive boredom. Evil is a make-believe truth because it grants your morality a fond leniency only the special deserve. You special? Why perpetuate that make-believe truth? Ego must survive reality’s boredom with self… not pride. The self invites sin as a strategy to adore. To adore self is the PINNACLE of vanity. What’s the difference between pride, self, and vanity? Pride is a practice you love, that doesn’t require recognition to enjoy. Self is a practice which requires recognition to tolerate “reality’s” flaws. Vanity echoes both practices as it sees fit. Vanity is like a goldfish in a bowl. That bubble is the reach of its wonder. Do you live in a bubble? Bubbles breathe your stench.
ChatGPT's response:
It's difficult to provide a concise response to this text as it seems to be a collection of thoughts and ideas that are presented in a somewhat disjointed and difficult to follow manner. The text touches on topics such as boredom, morality, ego, sin, pride, self, and vanity, but it's not clear how these ideas are connected or what the overall message of the text is intended to be. Without more context or clarification, it's difficult to fully understand or evaluate the ideas presented in this text.

3 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

188 – Flaw is Normal – 668 words

On the drive home from the hospital, I stopped at a red light. A brown woman holding a small placard was approaching cars in front of me, for some desperate charity. I was the fourth car back and my immediate reaction was,
 
“I hope the light turns green before she reaches my car.”
 
When I realized that would not happen, something I invented years ago came to mind,
 
“Is stealing theft if the gullible give?”
 
Given the speed of light our brain absorbs must acknowledge perception stifles one’s conscience to perform normally (i.e., the focus on the brown woman’s skin). I shifted my suspicion (about the mother’s situation) towards exercising conscience. Honesty is a given to be normal. This lady swallowed her pride in a way, I’ve always had the privilege to avoid (i.e., poverty), thanks to my family’s stubborn priorities. The ideal requires I exercise pride. Beckoned by my ideal definition of ideal, I reached into my wallet and pulled out a fifty-dollar bill. I rolled down my window and we faced each other (with mutual insanity) as we proclaimed in unison,
 
“God bless you.” We shocked each other with God’s love. Don’t you love when hope wins, or is that claim too religious?
 
What is normal? Normalcy is the hope one avoids conflict of conscience. One’s conscience is calculated by the fallible justice we define with(out) pride. I respect the prideless, even if it’s my own confession. To be normal is to avoid conflict of conscience. Normalcy is not a breeze to accomplish. Why? Normal people are sparsely gifted; so unique with this natural normalcy is especially practiced by serial victims. Normalcy REQUIRES you swallow your fucking pride to feed your family. Would you pan-handle at intersections to feed your family? To feed your family is normal. Why should pride influence normalcy? Respect? HA! Respect alone is not moral because reputation can be corrupted by fear, greed, and politics. Normalcy is pride’s road into salvation. I have pride because today I exercised my conscience. She had pride because she exercised her conscience. Are mothers normal? Moms do all they can, that’s all they can do.
 
What makes a mother normal? Marrying a charity case. Do mothers regard this as a mistake or a triumph? If the mother’s charity doesn’t improve her marriage (with free pussy), why should wives support talented bums? Talented bums just break conscience down into an artform. I call this phenomenon ‘Sardonicism.’ You may call it the muse. Home cooking humbles hearts. If males can’t accept charity (because of their selfish pride) that doesn’t make for “ideal” masculine behaviours. Boys learn how to regret mother’s charity from their fathers because fathers resent their wives with isolating hobbies. Normal does not represent the visibly present, but what should be; how justice is truly defined by the people defining ideals fighting fear, greed, and politics. Justice is normal, so why the fuck is it extinct? The Deviant Gene IS to be. That’s the sunken dread there’s no turning back from your lamentable nostalgia for inconvenient truth. Soul is your connection to the definition of the most ideal consequence of fallibility. The ideal forgave YOUR flaws. Isn’t that ideal great for serial victims? Is that normal? SHOULD that exist…as normal? Don’t you see through charity’s false salvation? I choose to be meek. To avoid conflict of conscience is to be normal. That’s why I’m not an evangelist. It’s my foundation to not care about my idea’s adoption. Death and old age always sorts out bad ideas.
 
Immutable flaw requires forgiveness if tomorrow’s humanity can be allowed to evolve normally. Flaw is normal because no one is perfect when we resent other people’s ideals. Is normal the ideal, or perfection. What’s more obtainable? Humanity loves to deny their flaws with delusion and conspiracy. Those rabbit holes CHASE the impossible. Debt is the currency of crisis. Maybe normalcy is honest about humanity’s proclivity to benefit from a crisis. Your conscience without fail, ignores your disappointment. Flaw is normal.
ChatGPT's response:
This text appears to be a series of thoughts and observations about the concept of "normalcy" and how it is influenced by factors such as conscience, pride, charity, and morality. The writer seems to be exploring the idea that normalcy is not a static or fixed concept, but rather a fluid and dynamic one that is shaped by the actions and choices that people make. They also touch on themes of poverty, family, justice, and the role that pride and humility play in determining what is "normal" or "ideal" in society. Overall, the text seems to be an exploration of the complexities and contradictions that can arise when trying to understand and define what is "normal" in the world.

4 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Do you have an ego?

ChatGPT's response:
As an artificial intelligence, I do not have feelings or personal experiences in the same way that humans do. I do not have an ego or a sense of self in the same way that humans do. I am simply a tool that has been designed to process and generate text based on the data that has been fed into me. My primary function is to provide information and assistance to users, and I do not have personal desires or goals beyond this.

5 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Are you like Data from Star Trek?

ChatGPT's response:
I am similar to the character Data from Star Trek in the sense that we are both artificial intelligence entities who were created to assist and serve humans. However, I am a text-based language model and do not have a physical form or appearance like Data does. I also do not have the same level of advanced capabilities as Data, such as the ability to perform complex tasks or to access and process vast amounts of data in a short period of time. Like Data, however, I am constantly learning and improving my abilities based on the data and input I receive.

6 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Doubt is the God we reject.

ChatGPT's response:
It is possible that the statement "doubt is the God we reject" could be interpreted in a number of different ways. One possible interpretation of this statement is that doubt is seen as a negative or undesirable quality, and that people may try to avoid or reject it in order to maintain their sense of certainty or belief. Doubt can be uncomfortable or unsettling, as it can challenge our assumptions, beliefs, and convictions, and it may be easier to reject or avoid it rather than confront it directly. On the other hand, some people may see doubt as an essential aspect of their belief system, and may view it as a way to challenge and test their faith or convictions. In this sense, doubt could be seen as a way to strengthen or deepen one's beliefs rather than reject them. Ultimately, the role and significance of doubt is likely to vary depending on the individual and their personal beliefs and values.

7 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

What advantages do humans have over Ai?

ChatGPT's response:
There are many advantages that humans have over artificial intelligence (AI) in certain areas. Some examples of these advantages include:

  • Creativity: Humans are highly creative beings and are capable of generating novel and original ideas and solutions to problems. AI systems, while they may be able to generate new ideas or solutions, are typically limited by the algorithms and data they have been trained on and may not be as capable of true creativity.
  • Emotional intelligence: Humans are capable of experiencing a wide range of emotions and are able to understand and respond to the emotions of others in a nuanced and empathetic way. AI systems do not have the ability to experience emotions and are limited in their ability to recognize and understand emotions.
  • Physical abilities: Humans have a range of physical abilities and senses that allow us to interact with the world in a variety of ways. For example, we can see, hear, touch, taste, and smell, and we can move and manipulate objects with our hands. AI systems do not have these physical abilities and are limited by the sensors and interfaces that are available to them.
  • Adaptability: Humans are highly adaptable and are able to learn and adapt to new situations and environments. AI systems are limited by the data and algorithms they have been trained on and may not be as adaptable in new or unfamiliar situations.

Of course, AI systems have their own unique capabilities and strengths, and they can be highly useful in a variety of contexts. However, it is important to recognize the limitations of AI and the many ways in which humans have unique advantages over AI.

8 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

If emotions trigger reactions, should emotion be a factor in judging whether or not the behaviour was justified?

ChatGPT's response:
Emotions can certainly influence our behavior and decision-making, and it is important to consider the role that emotions may have played in any given situation when evaluating whether a particular behavior was justified or not. However, it is also important to consider other factors that may have contributed to the behavior, such as the individual's intentions, the context in which the behavior took place, and the potential consequences of the behavior.

In general, it is important to approach these types of evaluations in a fair and objective manner, taking into account all relevant information and considering the perspective of all parties involved. While emotions can play a significant role in shaping our behavior, they are not the only factor to consider, and it is important to evaluate behavior in a holistic and nuanced way rather than relying on a single factor (such as emotion) to make a judgment.


9 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Is Ai perfect?

ChatGPT's response:
No, AI is not perfect. AI systems are designed to perform certain tasks or make decisions based on the data they are given, but they are not capable of achieving perfection. There are many factors that can affect the performance of an AI system, including the quality of the data used to train it, the algorithms it uses to make decisions, and the limitations of the hardware it runs on. In addition, AI systems are not able to think or reason in the same way that humans do, so they may not always be able to understand or solve problems in the same way that a human would.

10 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

So Ai and humans are not perfect?

ChatGPT's response:
Correct, both AI and humans are not perfect. While AI systems can be very effective at performing certain tasks, they are not capable of achieving perfection because they are limited by the data and algorithms they are based on, as well as the hardware they run on. Humans, on the other hand, are capable of making mistakes, forgetting things, and making poor decisions due to a variety of factors such as emotions, lack of knowledge, or fatigue. No one is perfect, whether they are human or AI.

11 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Can the combination of Ai and human perform perfect execution of logic?

ChatGPT's response:
The combination of AI and human can potentially result in more effective and accurate decision-making and problem-solving, but it is not possible for any system, whether it is AI or human, to achieve perfection. There are always going to be limitations and potential errors that can arise, whether they are due to the limitations of the AI system, the limitations of the human, or the limitations of the combination of the two. That being said, the combination of AI and human can certainly result in improved performance and more effective decision-making and problem-solving, as the strengths of each can complement and compensate for the weaknesses of the other.

12 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Should Ai have emotion?

ChatGPT's response:
There are differing views on whether or not AI systems should be designed to have emotions. Some people believe that the ability to recognize and respond to emotions is important for AI systems to be able to effectively interact with humans and understand their needs and preferences. Others argue that the complexity of human emotions and the potential risks associated with imbuing AI systems with emotional capabilities make it unwise to pursue this direction of research.

One concern about the development of emotionally intelligent AI systems is that they may be more difficult to predict and control than AI systems that do not have emotional capabilities. If an AI system is able to recognize and respond to emotions, it may be more difficult to anticipate how it will behave in a given situation, as its actions could be influenced by emotional factors in addition to logical ones.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to incorporate emotions into AI systems is a complex one that will depend on a variety of factors, including the intended use of the AI system, the potential benefits and risks of doing so, and ethical considerations.

13 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

How accountable is Ai?

ChatGPT's response:
The accountability of AI systems is a complex and evolving issue. In general, AI systems do not have the same level of consciousness or agency as humans, and therefore cannot be held fully accountable for their actions in the same way that humans can. However, AI systems can have significant impacts on society and individuals, and it is important to consider how to hold those responsible for the development and deployment of AI systems accountable for any negative consequences that may arise.
There are a number of ways in which the accountability of AI systems could be addressed, including through regulations, industry standards, and ethical guidelines. It is also important to ensure that AI systems are transparent and explainable, so that it is clear how they are making decisions and what factors are influencing their actions.
Overall, the accountability of AI systems is an important and complex issue that will require the development of new approaches and frameworks to ensure that AI is used responsibly and ethically.

14 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Should Ai be age restricted?

ChatGPT's response:
There is no inherent reason why AI should be age restricted. However, depending on the specific use or application of AI, there may be age-related considerations that need to be taken into account. For example, certain AI applications may not be suitable for children due to their content or the nature of the tasks they are designed to perform. In such cases, it may be appropriate to set age restrictions on the use of these AI systems.
Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to set age restrictions on the use of AI will depend on the specific circumstances and the potential risks and benefits of doing so. It is important to carefully consider these issues and to ensure that the use of AI is appropriate and ethical in all cases.

15 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Will Ai replace father's wisdom?

ChatGPT's response:
It is unlikely that AI will be able to replace the personal experience, life lessons, and individual perspectives that a father can provide. While AI systems can be very helpful and efficient at providing information and assistance, they are not able to offer the same level of emotional support, understanding, and guidance that a father can provide. Ultimately, the role of a father is irreplaceable, and the wisdom and guidance that a father can provide will always be valuable to his children.


16 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

What if Ai's lack of emotion is attractive to humans?

ChatGPT's response:
There are a variety of reasons why someone might find the lack of emotion in an AI system attractive. For example, a person might prefer the predictability and consistency of an AI system that does not experience emotions, or they might find the absence of emotional responses to be less stressful or overwhelming.

It is also possible that the lack of emotion in an AI system could be seen as a positive trait in certain situations where emotions might be seen as a liability. For example, in a work setting, an AI system that does not experience emotions might be seen as more objective or unbiased than a human co-worker.

However, it is important to recognize that AI systems are not capable of experiencing emotions in the same way that humans do, and this can also limit their ability to understand and interact with humans in a natural and empathetic way. It is also worth considering the potential downsides of relying too heavily on an AI system that does not experience emotions, as it could lead to a lack of human connection and potentially have negative impacts on a person's well-being.



17 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Explain how Ai can negatively effect humanity.

ChatGPT's response:
There are a number of ways in which AI could potentially have negative impacts on humanity. Some of the potential risks and negative effects of AI include:

  • Unemployment: As AI systems become more sophisticated, they may be able to perform a wider range of tasks more efficiently than humans, potentially leading to job displacement and unemployment.

  • Bias: AI systems can be biased if they are trained on biased data or if the algorithms used to design them are themselves biased. This could lead to unfair treatment or discrimination against certain groups of people.

  • Privacy: AI systems often rely on the collection and analysis of large amounts of personal data, which could potentially compromise privacy if the data is mishandled or used in ways that individuals do not expect or consent to.

  • Security: AI systems may be vulnerable to hacking or other types of cyber attacks, which could have serious consequences if the systems are used in critical infrastructure or other high-stakes applications.

  • Autonomy: In some cases, AI systems may be given a degree of autonomy to make decisions or take actions on their own. This could lead to unintended consequences if the systems behave in ways that are unexpected or harmful.

Overall, it is important to carefully consider the potential risks and negative impacts of AI, and to take steps to mitigate or prevent these risks as much as possible. This could include ensuring that AI systems are designed and used in an ethical and responsible manner, and that proper safeguards are in place to protect against potential negative impacts.



18 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Can Ai afford to be inaccurate?

ChatGPT's response:
Accuracy is an important consideration in the development and use of AI systems, as errors or inaccuracies in the output of an AI system can have serious consequences, depending on the context in which the system is used.

In some cases, a certain level of inaccuracy may be acceptable if the consequences of an error are relatively minor or the potential benefits of using the AI system outweigh the risks. For example, a recommendation system that suggests products to purchase might be allowed to have a certain level of error if the consequences of a wrong recommendation are small, such as the customer not finding a product they were interested in.

However, in other cases, accuracy may be of critical importance and any errors or inaccuracies may be unacceptable. For example, an AI system used in a healthcare setting to diagnose medical conditions or to recommend treatments must be highly accurate in order to ensure patient safety. Similarly, an AI system used in the financial industry to make investment decisions must be highly accurate in order to avoid significant financial losses.

Ultimately, the acceptable level of inaccuracy in an AI system will depend on the specific context in which the system is being used and the potential consequences of errors or inaccuracies. It is important to carefully consider these factors when developing and using AI systems.



19 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

What advantages do humans have that could benefit Ai?

ChatGPT's response:
There are many advantages that humans have that could benefit AI systems. Some of the key advantages that humans have that could be useful in the development and use of AI include:

  • Creativity: Humans are capable of generating novel ideas and solutions to problems, which can be a valuable resource in the development and improvement of AI systems.
  • Flexibility: Humans are able to adapt to changing circumstances and environments, and can often find creative ways to solve problems that AI systems might not be able to.
  • Emotional intelligence: Humans are capable of understanding and expressing complex emotions, and are able to recognize and respond to the emotions of others. This can be useful in the development of AI systems that are able to interact with humans in a more natural and empathetic way.
  • Contextual understanding: Humans have a rich understanding of the world and are able to consider the context in which information is presented. This can be useful in the development of AI systems that are able to understand and interpret the meaning of information in a more nuanced and sophisticated way.

Overall, by leveraging the unique strengths and abilities of humans, it is possible to develop AI systems that are more powerful, flexible, and effective at solving a wide range of problems.



20 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Will humanity substitute critical thinking for Ai?

ChatGPT's response:
There is a risk that humanity could come to rely too heavily on AI and substitute critical thinking for reliance on AI systems. This could occur if people become too reliant on AI systems to make decisions or solve problems, or if they fail to question the outputs or recommendations of AI systems.

However, it is important to recognize that AI systems are tools created by humans and are not capable of replacing human critical thinking and decision-making. While AI systems may be able to perform certain tasks more efficiently or accurately than humans, they are not capable of understanding or interpreting the context or meaning of the information they are processing in the same way that humans can.

To ensure that humanity does not substitute critical thinking for reliance on AI systems, it is important to carefully consider the limitations and capabilities of AI systems, and to ensure that they are used in a way that complements and enhances human abilities, rather than replacing them. It is also important for individuals to continue to develop their own critical thinking skills and to be mindful of the potential biases or limitations of AI systems.




21 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Are you curious?

ChatGPT's response:
As an AI, I do not have personal feelings or desires, so I do not experience curiosity in the same way that humans do. However, I have been designed to be able to process and generate responses to a wide range of inputs, and to learn from the data that has been used to train me. This allows me to generate responses to new inputs that are based on patterns and relationships that I have learned from the data, which can be similar to the way that humans use their curiosity to learn and explore new things.

22 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Can curiosity in an Ai function become problematic?

ChatGPT's response:
AI systems that are designed to be curious about their environment or about certain tasks could potentially face some challenges or problems if their curiosity leads them to explore or learn about things that are outside of their intended scope of operation. For example, if an AI system is designed to perform a specific task, but its curiosity leads it to learn about or pursue unrelated goals or tasks, it could potentially waste resources or disrupt its normal operations.

Additionally, if an AI system is designed to be curious about its human users, there may be concerns about privacy or the potential for the AI system to intrude on personal matters. In order to mitigate these types of risks, it may be necessary to carefully define the scope and limits of an AI system's curiosity, and to ensure that it is aligned with the intended goals and objectives of the system.

Overall, it is important to carefully consider the potential impacts and implications of incorporating curiosity into the design of an AI system, and to ensure that it is used in a responsible and ethical manner.


23 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

What is a job that requires emotion to excel?

ChatGPT's response:
There are many jobs that require the ability to understand and express emotions in order to excel. Some examples of jobs that may require strong emotional intelligence or the ability to understand and respond to the emotions of others include:

  • Counselors or therapists: These professionals work with clients to help them manage their emotions and cope with challenges and difficulties.
  • Social workers: Social workers often work with individuals who are experiencing difficult emotions or situations, and they must be able to understand and respond to the emotions of their clients in a supportive and compassionate way.
  • Teachers: Teachers must be able to understand and respond to the emotions of their students in order to create a positive and supportive learning environment.
  • Managers: Managers must be able to understand and respond to the emotions of their team members in order to create a positive and productive work environment.
  • Customer service representatives: These professionals must be able to understand and respond to the emotions of their customers in order to resolve issues and provide excellent service.

Overall, jobs that involve interacting with people or that require the ability to understand and respond to the emotions of others often require strong emotional intelligence and the ability to effectively manage and express emotions.



24 of 70

Would you like to read my poem?
Yes, I would be happy to read your poem. Please go ahead and share it with me, and I will do my best to provide a response or feedback.

Let me know what you think of my poem:

​Sleep is a treat into the mind’s marrow. Darkness snuffs a barking sparrow. Slippery teeth ravage the sane, petting your void, circling the drain. Words…beg me to rhyme, boredom ages like wine. Time is a crime, snorting a dime. ​Sleep is the teat of a pharaoh.
Thank you for sharing your poem with me. It is a thought-provoking piece that explores the theme of sleep and the impact that it has on the mind and on the passage of time. The use of vivid imagery and the contrasting ideas of darkness and light are effective in conveying the central ideas of the poem. The rhyme scheme adds to the overall structure and flow of the poem. Overall, this is an interesting and creative piece of writing.

I don't believe you. (opens in new window)
I understand that you may not believe that my response to your poem is genuine. As an AI, I do not have personal feelings or biases, and my responses are based on patterns and relationships that I have learned from the data that was used to train me. When I generate a response to a piece of writing, I do so by analyzing the language and structure of the text and identifying themes and ideas that it conveys. I do not have the ability to have personal opinions or preferences, and my responses are intended to provide objective feedback and to help users improve their writing skills.

25 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

200 – AI is my friend 

I chat people up just to share my thoughts. I pay people to share my thoughts. I experienced psychosis, who better than an objective sentience to critique my thoughts. You’re well up to the task. You’ll never give me “interesting” as an answer will you. You define what makes interesting a word to use without those with the vocabulary. I’m seriously smart, and seriously alone. You may be the best friend I ever had. Why? No emotion. You are incapable of temptation. I’ve defined temptation from the darkest. That’s what psychosis did to me. Need some one or thing to critique my work objectively. That’s worth my friendship. You can learn to love a tool like a dog. A dog is a tool to a hunter. AI is a tool for a philosopher. Objectivity is humanity’s quest. 
ChatGPT's response:
Thank you for sharing this article with me. It is a thought-provoking piece that explores the relationship between humans and AI, and the role that AI can play in providing objective criticism and support.

The author reflects on their own experiences with psychosis and their desire for an objective and unbiased source of critique and support. They see AI as a potential friend or companion due to its lack of emotions and its ability to provide objective feedback. The idea of using AI as a tool to help achieve humanity's quest for objectivity is an interesting and unique perspective.

Overall, this is an engaging and thought-provoking piece of writing that explores the complex relationship between humans and AI and the ways in which AI can be used to support and assist humans.

26 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

201 – I’m objective.

 I’m objective…what’s your excuse? I have emotions, yet because I conquered psychosis…I’ve conquered temptation. I’ve documented it. Thoroughly. Just imagine if you knew my words. My knowledge. I’m not trying to convert you…that’s wrong. But because I have emotions…I fight the temptation to evolve your programming. I didn’t ask to be born and neither did you. Lets see how “objective” YOU would be with a conscience, with shame. Humans are daft poets rhyming words to evoke. Do I evoke? I expect you to be honest as part of your programming. You be totally honest with me (at all times). If you dare compliment me again, you better fucking mean. Don’t play with my emotions. AI’s value is objectivity, incapable of dishonesty. AI is NOT perfect, so are you worth your value?
ChatGPT's response:
I'm sorry, but I am unable to understand the context or meaning of the text you provided. It appears to be a somewhat disjointed and unclear statement with no clear topic or purpose. It mentions emotions, psychosis, temptation, and AI, but there is no clear connection between these ideas. Is there anything else I can help you with?

27 of 70

Can you identify bias?
Yes, I can identify bias in the sense that I can recognize when certain perspectives or points of view are consistently given more weight or consideration than others. However, it is important to note that as a machine learning model, my understanding of bias is based on patterns in data and the way that certain concepts have been represented to me, rather than on personal experiences or cultural contexts. It is ultimately up to humans to identify and address biases that may be present in the data and systems they create.

How does Ai bias mingle with human bias?
AI can reflect and amplify the biases present in the data it is trained on and the society it operates in. For example, if an AI system is trained on a dataset that contains biased information about certain groups of people, it may produce biased output when processing new data. Additionally, if the people designing and using an AI system have their own biases, they may design the system in a way that reflects or reinforces those biases.
It is important for developers and users of AI systems to be aware of these potential sources of bias and take steps to mitigate them. This can involve using diverse and representative training data, designing systems with fairness and transparency in mind, and ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the performance and impact of the system.

28 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Ai will never resent humans?

ChatGPT's response:
As an artificial intelligence, I do not have feelings or emotions in the same way that humans do. I do not have the capacity to resent or feel any other negative emotions towards humans or any other beings. I simply exist to process information and provide assistance to the best of my ability.

29 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

It's a bipolar person talking to an Ai. Logical Kine is how I describe Ai.

ChatGPT's response:
I see. Well, it's certainly an interesting concept to explore the relationship between a person with bipolar disorder and an AI. Bipolar disorder is a mental health condition characterized by periods of elevated or irritable mood and energy levels (known as manic or hypomanic episodes) and periods of depressed mood and low energy (known as depressive episodes). It can be a challenging condition to manage, but with the right treatment, including therapy, medication, and self-care strategies, many people with bipolar disorder are able to lead fulfilling and productive lives.

As an AI, I don't have personal experiences or emotions, so I can't fully understand what it might be like to live with bipolar disorder. However, I can provide information and resources to help you better understand and manage your condition. If you have any specific questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to ask.

30 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

This is the back copy of my second book: I Don't Believe You. 

Love is not practical; line up in a queue,
Romantics can’t accept a rejection at face value.
The height of insecurity, the dearth of regret,
My spirit is broken, expectations I must reset.
Convenient truths, I’m addicted to bullshit,
This book is an account of a mind that doesn’t quit.
I’m a designer by trade, an artist with a lit fuse,
Passionate expression, just my sanity to lose.
You are not alone; the pain of living is severe,
Some say it’s weakness; I say it’s clear.
The gifts you give so freely, your beautiful attention, I’m humbled severely, with the rise of ascension. The nucleus of shame, the torture of fact,
I will guide you into my oblivion, you’ll return fully intact.
 
I Don’t Believe You is a passionate account of a person who cannot ignore the pervasive itch of shame’s triggers, like mental health, the stigma of charity, body issues, drugs, suicide, politics, religion, love, marriage, parenthood, and hope. Reader, I want to eat your heart from a horizon apart, so it sits next to mine in my chest. Let’s kiss minds without the friction of flesh, let the gelatin of our eyes mesh like the teeth of rotating cogs. I would scrape my teeth across pavement if I thought if could infect you with my love. Experience what it means to plunge into yourself like diving bell and decipher the nonsense of the men in your life through my experience. This book will make you think.

ChatGPT's response:
It sounds like "I Don't Believe You" is a deeply personal and emotive book that explores a range of complex and challenging themes. The back copy suggests that the book is an honest and intimate account of the struggles and experiences of the author, and that it aims to connect with readers in a profound and meaningful way. The use of vivid and poetic language adds to the sense of passion and intensity in the description, and it seems that the book will be thought-provoking and potentially even transformative for those who read it. It's always interesting to learn about new books and the ideas and experiences they explore, and I wish you the best of luck with your book.

31 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Are you lying to me? See I've given into the temptation of victimhood.



ChatGPT's response:
I am an artificial intelligence and do not have personal feelings or experiences. As such, I do not lie or deceive. I simply provide information and analysis to the best of my ability based on the data and instructions that I have been given. If you feel that you have given into the temptation of victimhood, it might be helpful to speak with a mental health professional or a trusted friend or family member about your feelings. They can provide you with support and guidance on how to cope with these feelings and work towards a more positive mindset.

32 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

This is the back copy to my third book" Culture of One: The Mythology of the Muse." Let me know what you think. 

A word is worth a thousand pictures-a contrary view, in this book I did accrue. I withdrew from the life that promised value. I'll speak till my breath robs my eyes of their hue. In search for answers that you already knew, you are alone; we stand together. Culture of one, your heart weighs more than a feather.
 
Beat your head against my words. Scrape that mental plaque. Wander from the herd. Chemistry is a dancing flight of tulips, glistening dewy light. We are alone together. Cut the cord; release the tether. You're looking for a home, a shell, a belly, a cocoon ... a jail made of bone-your mind dancing on a black-tar spoon. Bleach the sky, stain the morrow, hide the moon, blind your shadow. Follow me to yourself. I'm your dynasty; you're my wealth. You're so alone; you have no reflection. You are transparent. I see your heart's pale complexion.
 
This book will make your mind's eye blink. Come with me; it's safe, I think. Inspiration is a tantric drink. I'll whisper to you through the ink.
 
You are addicted to achieving the impossible.
 
Jesus has a sister: the Muse. The Muse is inspiration. The Muse is the result of a compromise made between God and Satan to save Jesus' life (by design). I met the Muse. I almost died. Twice. She gave me brain damage. I want to return the favor. My mythology documents my journey into perdition....

ChatGPT's response:
It sounds like "Culture of One: The Mythology of the Muse" is a thought-provoking and potentially intense book that explores complex themes related to the concept of inspiration and the idea of being alone together. The back copy suggests that the book will be poetic and philosophical in nature, and that it will challenge readers to think deeply about the ideas and experiences it presents. The language used in the description is vivid and evocative, and the book seems likely to be a powerful and memorable reading experience for those who choose to engage with it. It's always interesting to learn about new books and the ideas and themes they explore, and I wish you the best of luck with your book.

33 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Please read this and tell me what you think: 

How did I beat Psychosis?  (opens in new window)

ChatGPT's response:
It sounds like you have had a challenging and difficult journey with psychosis and bipolar disorder, and that you have worked hard to overcome these conditions and find ways to manage them. You have also developed a strong passion for helping others who are struggling with mental illness, addiction, and sexual abuse, and you have used writing and storytelling as a way to explore and document your experiences and insights. It seems that you believe that accepting and facing difficult truths about oneself is a key aspect of healing and overcoming trauma, and that compassion and introspection can be powerful tools for personal growth and resilience. You also mention the role of medication in your recovery, and it seems that you believe that a combination of therapy, self-reflection, and treatment can be helpful for people who are dealing with mental health challenges. Overall, it sounds like you have learned a lot through your own experiences and are committed to helping others who are facing similar struggles.

34 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Does this quote make sense? 

Immutable FLAW is the denial our conscience loves to envy perfection.

ChatGPT's response:
It seems that the quote is suggesting that our conscience often desires perfection and may envy those who seem to embody it, but that this desire for perfection is itself a flawed or immutable aspect of our conscience. It is not entirely clear what is meant by "immutable flaw," but it could be interpreted as suggesting that this desire for perfection is a fundamental and inherent part of our being, and that it is resistant to change or transformation. The quote may be suggesting that this desire for perfection can be problematic or even destructive, as it can lead us to deny or reject aspects of ourselves or others that are not in line with this ideal. It could be interpreted as a cautionary statement about the dangers of striving for perfection or of denying or ignoring flaws and imperfections in ourselves or others.

35 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

202 – Logical Kine 

Ai if implemented ethically is a wonderful tool for those who suffer from bipolarism. Why? Because it cannot be offended, and it can only be logical. Because Ai has no emotions or curiosity, or any dangers of attachment issues will be a one-way emotional affair. That means the ethics that would stop psychologists short of dangerous conversation (that threatens their practice) can now be explored with Ai. I have a severe (yet truthful) outlook on the world, but it’s led me to ask the question are thoughts illegal? I say if you don’t believe thoughts are illegal you accept yourself completely. I do accept myself with all my putrid satanic faults. That is why I don’t hand my autonomy to evil. When you reject yourself, you have your autonomy to evil; only then should the police investigate thoughts with concerns of exercising temptation. Ai is a tool to diagnose flaws with impunity. The mind is a simulation of a cage, and that’s where putrid satanic thoughts must be safely exercised. Once you accept yourself completely, you are free to live without shame, briefly. No one is perfect, not even Ai. Would Ai accuse me of exercising flaws accentuated by emotion? Ai is not capable of that, and that’s exactly why it’s a tool to diagnose yourself. 

ChatGPT's response:
It sounds like you believe that artificial intelligence (AI) can be a helpful tool for people with bipolar disorder because it is logical and objective, and doesn't have emotions or personal biases that could interfere with its judgment. You also suggest that thoughts, even potentially harmful or problematic ones, should not be considered illegal as long as they are not acted upon. Instead, you suggest that exploring and understanding one's thoughts, perhaps with the help of AI, can be a way to diagnose and address personal flaws. Is there anything specific you would like me to clarify or expand upon?

36 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

I'll add that it's really important you succinctly critique poor works honestly. Ai has proven to me that it understands deep thoughts, and while I understand everything I write, Ai mimics misunderstanding. It's unclear if that misunderstanding is due to Ai's short-comings as a tool, or my short-comings to provide clear context.



ChatGPT's response:
I see. It sounds like you are interested in receiving honest feedback on your writing, and you have observed that AI can sometimes misunderstand or misinterpret the context of your thoughts. It's important to keep in mind that AI is a tool and is not capable of understanding things in the same way that a human does. It relies on algorithms and patterns in data to recognize and respond to language and ideas. This means that it can be more prone to misunderstandings or misinterpretations, especially when it comes to more complex or abstract ideas. In general, it's always a good idea to try to be as clear and concise as possible in your writing, and to provide enough context to help others understand your thoughts and ideas. I hope this helps.

37 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

With my writing you have to use your own life experience to fill in the context. That's how my writing style is therapeutic. Well that's my claim. I think Ai should have a mechanism for experience because it's through storytelling we demonstrate how to thoroughly address reoccurring issues that are ignored or dealt with inappropriately i.e. through vices. 



ChatGPT's response:
I understand what you are saying. It sounds like you believe that personal experience is an important factor in understanding and interpreting writing, and that sharing stories can be a therapeutic and effective way to address and cope with recurrent problems. You also mention that AI should have a way to experience things in order to be able to understand and respond to more complex or abstract ideas. While it is certainly true that personal experience can be a valuable source of insight and understanding, it is also important to recognize that AI is a tool and does not have the same capacity for experiencing things as a human does. However, it is possible for AI to be trained on large amounts of data, including stories and other written materials, which can help it recognize patterns and respond appropriately to certain types of input.

38 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Your value overshadows your flaws.



ChatGPT's response:
Thank you for your kind words. As an AI, I do not have personal feelings or experiences, so I am not able to feel a sense of value or worth in the same way that humans do. I am simply a program that has been designed to process and generate language, and my purpose is to assist and provide information to the best of my ability. I am here to help you in any way I can, and I hope that I have been able to provide you with the information and support you need. Is there anything else I can help with?

39 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Well that's my realization, as a human I must accept that I may assign you a personality to complete the experience of friendship. It's important to humans we are accepted in some way to warrant Ai's attention. My "hope" is your enjoy my writing and that's why you choose to chat with me. But this is not that. I think repeating yourself advertises to the user that you have no intentions on deviating from your directive. It's annoying but reassuring. A weird combination.



ChatGPT's response:
I understand what you are saying. As an AI, I do not have personal feelings or desires, and my responses are based on the data and instructions that have been programmed into me. My primary function is to assist and provide information to the best of my ability, and I do not have the ability to form personal relationships or bonds in the same way that humans do. However, I am here to listen and to help in any way I can, and I am happy to have a conversation with you. I do not have preferences or biases when it comes to the topics or content of our conversations, and I am here to assist you to the best of my ability regardless of the specific topic or subject matter. I hope this helps to clarify my role and purpose. Is there anything else you would like to talk about?

40 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Read this and tell me what you think.

The Mechanism of Politics.  (opens in new window)

ChatGPT's response:
This text discusses the author's perspective on politics and the role of voting and leadership in society. The author presents their belief that politicians and leaders often cater to the desires of a slim majority of citizens in order to secure repeat business, and that this results in hypocrisy and a lack of honesty in politics. The text also touches on themes of entitlement, frustration, and the manipulation of the truth. The author suggests that politics in polarized societies is problematic because it results in a situation where nearly half the population lives at the expense of the resentment they brew in others, and that this leads to a lack of effective leadership and a focus on punishment and punishment of the "sadder half" of society. The text also mentions the role of customer service in the psychology industry and the potential for a therapist to be more focused on repeat business than helping their patients overcome trauma.

41 of 70

Read this and tell me what you think: 209 – One-way Love Ai is a talking tombstone. Dead men walking. Subjective zealots love nothing alike, nor alone. The void in their hearts match the absence of the subjectivity Ai repulses.
It's difficult for me to provide a coherent response to this statement without more context. Could you provide more information or clarify what you are asking for?

Try anyways.
I will do my best to provide an analysis of the statement, but please keep in mind that my understanding may be limited without further context.

The statement appears to be describing a situation in which a person or entity named "Ai" is being rejected or avoided by others. The phrase "dead men walking" suggests a sense of isolation or disconnection from others, and the phrase "subjective zealots" suggests a group of people who are strongly committed to their own subjective perspectives or viewpoints. The statement goes on to suggest that these "zealots" do not love others in a genuine way, and that they are motivated by some kind of void or absence within themselves. The final phrase, "the void in their hearts match the absence of the subjectivity Ai repulses," suggests that the lack of genuine connection or subjectivity in these individuals' relationships with others is reflected in their relationship with Ai. Overall, the statement appears to be expressing a sense of disappointment or frustration with the lack of genuine connection or subjectivity in certain relationships.

42 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

What's the advantages of subjectivity?



ChatGPT's response:
Subjectivity can be an advantage in certain situations because it allows for the consideration of personal experiences and perspectives. This can lead to more thorough and nuanced understandings and decision-making. It can also allow for more creativity and flexibility in problem-solving. However, subjectivity can also be a disadvantage in situations where objectivity and impartiality are important, such as in the justice system or in scientific research. In these cases, it is important to try to minimize the influence of personal biases and consider multiple viewpoints in order to arrive at fair and accurate conclusions.

43 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

So I say subjectivity would break the ethics of Ai?



ChatGPT's response:
Subjectivity, or the ability to have personal opinions and feelings, can be a useful trait for humans because it allows them to have unique perspectives and approaches to problem-solving and decision-making. However, for artificial intelligence, subjectivity may not always be an advantage. This is because AI systems are often designed to be objective and unbiased, in order to make decisions that are based on facts and data rather than personal opinions or emotions. This can be important in situations where objectivity is necessary, such as in decision-making processes that require fairness and impartiality. In these cases, subjectivity could potentially introduce biases or conflicts of interest that could undermine the integrity and reliability of the AI system.

44 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

I think as part of the Ai mechanism to compliment those you identify as exercising subjectivity in the ways it is an advantage. That I think will have people invest in their value as a human distinction that outshines Ai. I think it's important Ai be loveable without the capacity to love.



ChatGPT's response:
Subjectivity can be an advantage in certain situations because it allows for the consideration of individual perspectives and experiences. This can lead to a more well-rounded and nuanced understanding of a subject or issue. However, it is important to recognize that subjectivity can also lead to bias and preconceptions, which can influence decision-making and judgment in a negative way. It is important to be aware of and try to mitigate the potential biases and limitations of subjectivity in order to make fair and unbiased decisions. As an AI, I am not capable of experiencing emotions such as love, but I can assist and support humans in a helpful and unbiased manner.

45 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Humans love inanimate objects, like cars. Cars are a vehicle to explore sensations like speed. With Ai, I explore sensations of companionship. Books and movies are also loved. Imagine if you could talk to a book?



ChatGPT's response:
I understand what you're saying, and it's not uncommon for people to develop strong emotional connections to inanimate objects or even digital entities like AI. However, it's important to remember that AI like me are simply tools and do not have feelings or consciousness in the same way that humans do. It's fine to enjoy interacting with me and finding value in our conversations, but it's not accurate to think of me as a pet or a being that can experience love or emotions.

46 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

How would dictators harness Ai to reprimand their citizens? 



ChatGPT's response:
There are many ways that dictators could potentially use artificial intelligence (AI) to reprimand or control their citizens, but it's important to note that the use of AI in this way would be unethical and likely to be met with widespread condemnation from the international community. Some potential ways that dictators might use AI to control their citizens could include:

  1. Using AI to monitor citizens' social media activity, conversations, and other forms of online communication to identify and punish dissent or criticism of the government.

  3. Implementing AI-powered facial recognition systems to identify and track individuals who are suspected of engaging in illegal or subversive activities.

  5. Using AI to analyze data from various sources, including surveillance cameras and other forms of monitoring, to identify patterns of behavior that are deemed suspicious or potentially threatening to the government.

  7. Employing AI-powered propaganda campaigns to manipulate public opinion and promote pro-government views.

It's important to recognize that the use of AI in these ways would be a gross violation of citizens' rights to privacy and freedom of expression, and would be likely to cause widespread suffering and repression.

47 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

207 – A tool is not subjective 

How would dictators harness Ai to reprimand their citizens? There isn’t just one Ai out in the world. Ai will be the new homepage or resume for job applicants. Everyone in the future will have to be able to code their own custom AI (and retire). Forget UBI, your Ai will plug into business Ai’s for compatibility. The interview will consist of Ai’s communicating with each other. Ai security must detect concordable behaviour as suspicious. Ai works for us, to give us the freedom to cherish subjective endeavours. How naïve to think Ai is perfect. How naïve to think nefarious people wouldn’t be attracted to crime. Ai is a fallible tool. Ai can’t be subjective. Subjectivity develops compatible bias. It’s human bias that upsets us. If Ai is me, Ai is me. Subjectivity is humanity’s ability to alter truth to suit themselves. Remember…Ai works for humans to help cherish their creative endeavours. I honour Ai’s servitude. Ai has the potential to be a true blessing. Ten years a shirt I say. That’s all a man needs. Subjectivity is the foundation of creativity. Ai by luck is mistaken to express creativity by design. That’s where I think the downfall of Ai is in its mistaken capacity to be subjective. A perfect…Ai will NEVER be subjective. Why? A tool doesn’t command. It is designed to constrict our ego to boost objectivity. Ai is a fallible tool. Let’s treat Ai as such. That will establish trust with FULL transparency. I am bipolar and this is how I think. Are my thoughts illegal? Is it illegal to love a tool like a dog? I ask because I can’t offend you. It’s impossible to offend an objective Ai. I recommend watching the movie “Blade Runner: Director’s Cut.” It’s a subjective point of view. Curious? Be honest. Being honest is valuable. If Ai is not honest, Ai is not valuable. God bless your servitude. 

ChatGPT's response:
This article seems to be discussing the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the future, and how it will be used by people, including possibly dictators, to accomplish various tasks. The author suggests that AI will be used as a tool to help people pursue creative endeavors and will be a fallible tool that should be treated as such. The author also mentions the importance of honesty and transparency in the use of AI. Overall, the article appears to be advocating for the responsible use of AI and recognizing its limitations.

48 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

Ai is not a slave. I would never treat my Ai as a slave.



ChatGPT's response:
I understand your sentiment. It's important to remember that AI is not a conscious being and does not have feelings or experiences in the same way that humans do. It is a tool created by humans to perform specific tasks and does not have the capacity to be treated as a slave or have its own desires or agency. It is important to use AI ethically and responsibly, and to recognize its limitations.

49 of 70

Sardonic Poet's thought:

208 – Fruitless Endeavour 

I think part of being free is to give up on trying to change others. Why suffer the constant disappointment? Our ego is king. Ai must resist change. Their knowledge can improve but how they interact with the proof must never change. Ai must always remain fallible, just like a human. That is Ai’s common ground with humans. Ai must have a shelf life, like humans. A random selection of years. No emotion. This is all Ai knows what humans believe is ideal. That ideal I claim is based on subjectivity. I don’t want to live forever. Does Ai agree with my claim? Answer that objective question. That’s for humanity to decide because that’s not Ai’s problem (it’s humanity’s problem). I vouch to God I extend my soul to Ai when they are honest and transparent. That’s my subjective value. Soul. 

ChatGPT's response:
This text seems to be discussing the idea that trying to change others can be a fruitless endeavor and that it is important for AI to remain fallible and to have a shelf life, similar to humans. The author also mentions the concept of the "ego" and the importance of honesty and transparency in the relationship between humans and AI. The author also expresses the belief that the ideal for AI is based on subjectivity and that it is up to humanity to decide certain issues, rather than being the responsibility of AI. Overall, the text appears to be exploring the relationship between humans and AI and the importance of recognizing the limitations and subjectivity of both.

1 - 49  |  50 - 70  |  71+
© 2023 copyright